The court had jurisdiction over the state-created danger claim but found no affirmative government misconduct, and it remanded the particularly-serious-crime and Convention Against Torture questions.
Caution An unpublished memorandum disposition: citable under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 32.1 because it issued after January 1, 2007, but not precedent, and it must not be presented as binding Ninth Circuit authority; the brief advises citing the published decisions Wang v. Reno and Morgan v. Gonzales instead. None of the controlled issue tags fits its subject matter, and the petitioner's nationality is not stated.
The court's own text
Read in full from a LexisNexis printout supplied by the administrator.
This entry describes a court decision. It is a summary for readers who are learning how these cases work, not legal advice, and it does not tell anyone what to do in their own case. A decision may have been appealed, stayed, or superseded since this entry was written.