Decisions

Kien Mbah v. Warden, Richwood Detention Center

W.D. La. · September 25, 2026

Court W.D. La.
Decided September 25, 2026
Docket 3:26-cv-03733-AVH-KGG (ECF No. 6)
Judge Alexander C. Van Hook, District Judge.
Outcome Interim relief denied
Disposition Motion for a temporary restraining order denied. The habeas petition referred to the magistrate judge for a recommendation.
Third country Rwanda. The petitioner stated that she had received notice of removal to Rwanda.

The petitioner said that the respondents took her into custody on 18 September 2026 “without written reasons or an informal interview.” She argued that they had breached the Accardi doctrine by failing to follow their own regulations on revocation of release, 8 C.F.R. §§ 241.4(l) and 241.13(i). The court noted: “However, Petitioner does state she has received notice of removal to Rwanda.”

The court referred the habeas petition to the magistrate judge and denied the motion for a temporary restraining order: “Petitioner has made no clear showing of a substantial likelihood she will prevail on the merits.” Because the motion asked for the same relief as the petition, an order barring her removal from the United States or her transfer outside the Western District of Louisiana, the court applied an earlier decision of the district, Da Silva v. Tellez (W.D. La. 8 December 2025), which it quoted: “The Court will not allow Petitioner to commit an end-run around the habeas process.”

Caution A denial of interim relief. The habeas petition was referred to the magistrate judge and was undecided when the order issued; no later order in the case was read. The order does not state the petitioner’s nationality or the form of protection she holds.

Third-country removal Revocation of supervision Informal interview Compliance with regulations Temporary restraining order Habeas jurisdiction

The court's own text

Read from the public federal court record.

This entry describes a court decision. It is a summary for readers who are learning how these cases work, not legal advice, and it does not tell anyone what to do in their own case. A decision may have been appealed, stayed, or superseded since this entry was written.

← All decisions in the register