The court lifted its stay of transfer. The petitioner had not carried his burden under Zadvydas, because, as the respondents showed, his “removal is not only foreseeable but already scheduled within the presumptively constitutional detention period.” It added: “Additionally, Respondents are removing Petitioner to Equatorial Guinea on a charter flight.” And: “This alternative destination is consistent with Petitioner’s withholding of removal to Cameroon.”
Caution Superseded the next day: on 28 July 2026 the court granted a temporary restraining order in part and reinstated the stay, as recorded separately in this register. This order gives 30 April 2025 as the date the removal order became administratively final; the order of 28 July gives 25 April 2025.
Third-country removal Detention Zadvydas Stay of transfer Withholding of removal CAT protection
This entry describes a court decision. It is a summary for readers who are learning how these cases work, not legal advice, and it does not tell anyone what to do in their own case. A decision may have been appealed, stayed, or superseded since this entry was written.